A. Background factors

  • a) Declining respect for Professionals both corporately and individually.
  • b) A series of cases involving:-
    i) A breakdown in the trust between the Professional and the Public;
    ii) Damage to the reputation of or a loss of public confidence in the profession;
    iii) Calls for increased protection for members of the public as a result of allegations of failures on the part of Professionals.
  • c) Too many unfortunate outcomes to those cases.
  • d) An increasing expectation by members of the public of Professionals who equate a sub standard result with a substandard service.
  • e) Continuing Legislative changes since 2000 designed to promote best practice amongst Professionals mandating self regulation by the various medical professions.
  • f) Non medical professions, voluntarily adopting similar principles of self regulation.
  • g) Standards of, and procedures to enforce, best practice are being developed and adopted and applied by many Professional Bodies to regulate the activities of their members.
  • h) The Professional Organisation who are concerned to serve and protect the profession are increasingly the enforcers of standards to be attained (i.e. the Regulator).
A. Background factors

B. Current situation

  • a) Regulators insofar as they have not already done so are adopting Regulatory (including Disciplinary) Procedures and Codes of Conduct and are charged to ensure that their members maintain the standards of the professions.
  • b) Procedure specific training and delivery to provide a reliable technical service is now what is required by Regulators rather than the general application of a body of skills.
  • c) The objective is that:-
    i) Professionals should be very clearly aware of and therefore can more easily comply with their duties;
    ii) Professionals should be protected from the ever increasing expectations of the public where too often a sub-standard result is equated with a sub-standard service;
    iii) Public confidence in the profession as a whole will be enhanced.
  • d) There is now a rise of a managerial elite who seek to control what Professionals do and how they are to do it. It is to be hoped they do not pursue ever more unrealistic standards or apply them unreasonably and this is where adequate representation is so important.
  • e) Allegations of Fitness to Practice or Misconduct will be investigated and determined in accordance with procedures adopted or to be adopted in roughly similar ways by the various Regulators. The standards required for each profession should reflect the degree of risk involved in practicing. Equally sanctions imposed should be proportionate to the nature and gravity of the issue. Good advice and representation often affects the outcome.
  • f) In matters of disciplinary proceedings all evidence must be properly examined, ultimately in an adversarial hearing, unless previously compromised to the Professional’s satisfaction. Where there is doubt it is the function of good representation to have this resolved in favour of the accused.
B. Current situation

C. Specific matters

i) For those involved in Healthcare or Social Care:-
Your Regulators include, according to your profession:-

  • GMC
  • GDC
  • GOC
  • GOsC
  • HPC
  • NMC
  • RPSGB
  • PSNI

and generally Social Care Councils. Pervading all of which is the Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence (CHRE).

Click here for an explanation of the investigation procedures as applied to Medical Doctors. The explanation describes a procedure specific to the GMC who are the Professional Body for Doctors, i.e. the Regulator It can usefully be read as background information to give you some idea of similar procedures that are applied by the other Regulators. The GMC is possibly the most established Regulatory Body of all the professions in terms of the length of time it has practiced as a Regulator. It is from experience of the pitfalls and practices of the GMC over many years that many of the principles now of general application have been tested.

ii) For those who are not involved in the Medical Industry:-

Your Professional Body will have adopted or will be considering adopting codes of conduct and a Regulatory Function. If you, as a Professional, are the victim of unwarranted allegations you may be called to account according to the constitution of the profession concerned. Whether this is a matter of Professional misconduct or not we can act for you.

There are approximately one hundred Associations, Academies, Societies, Institutes, Councils and Colleges covering all sorts of diverse occupations, including Architects, Art Historians, Tax Technicians, Engineers, Managers and Directors, Landscapers, Town Planners, Surveyors and Secretaries.

The general principles referred to on this site are very broadly similar to that which is likely to apply to you.

iii) A reminder for all:-

What is being discussed on this site is not litigation arising from a claim against you, as a Professional for, e.g. negligence. It is representation advice and assistance, in relation to complaints or allegations made against you by, or involving, your Regulator which may or may not arise out of alleged or proved negligence but which in any event does involve your Fitness to Practice in the future as judged by your Regulator. Charges brought against you may arise from allegations of dishonesty, misconduct, poor performance, physical or mental health or factors involving the protection of the reputation of the profession or the protection of the public

D. What is to come?

a women talking to antoher wmon in the office
a women talking to antoher wmon in the office

Why choose Davis Blank Furniss?

Merit Icon Founded in 1877
Team members icon 60+ experienced employees
Apartment block icon Offices in Manchester & Glossop
Law Scales Full service law firm

Testimonials

Read what our clients have to say...

View All

Excellent experience start to finish – always very responsive to any queries and the turnaround on the property I was buying was very quick, even in the busy time leading up to stamp duty deadline. Jenny was always very helpful and went above and beyond to close on a short timescale.

Ben Armitage

“Very approachable, practical solutions to problems, but most of all very responsive which I personally think is very important because if you need help, you need it quickly, or at least to know someone is looking at it for you”.

Joanne Rowe, Finance Director, Greater Manchester Chamber

“Always able to contact, very approachable, friendly and professional”

Nives Feely, JAM Recruitment

“I believe I have been able to establish a professional working relationship with everyone I have come into contact. Importantly, I sense the relationships which have been established give me the confidence that I can make contact with Davis Blank Furniss at any time and on any matter. I would also like to express my thanks to the very impressive “gatekeepers” who work in reception, not only for making me very welcome, but also for their professionalism”

Bill Pryke, CEO, Chartered Institution of Civil Engineering Surveyors

“Thank you for your efficient and friendly help throughout this process. We have had it easy but your approach has been part of that”.

Robert Amsbury (Conveyancing Client)

“I would like to take this opportunity to thank you personally for the ongoing support and assistance the firm has offered to our parents over the years. I hope also that we may be able to call on you if necessary in the future.”

Valerie Fisher (Probate Client)

“Jo always provides great service, understands our needs and delivers on her promises. Our needs are relatively simple but the complexity arises out of the volume of work and short time frames, Jo always delivers.”

Peter Fernandez, Corporate Director at Royal Bank of Scotland

“A big thank you to all who dealt with my wife’s claim… We would not hesitate to recommend Davis Blank Furniss to anyone that may be in a situation like we have been…”

Anon (Personal Injury client)

“Before putting my case in Kirsty (Morbey)’s capable hands I’ve met a couple of other solicitors. None of them listen to me as intently as Kirsty and showed me as much empathy and understanding as she did. Simultaneously she was able to look at my case from legal perspective, explain all the options and follow each of our meetings with written summary of the discussed matters (in timely manner). Her advice was invaluable and led me to successfully ending the case matter (hopeful for good). I’m forever grateful for he work and would definitely recommend her to anyone looking for reliable, knowledgeable and committed solicitor”.

Anon (Family client)
5 star service

Our Manchester office is rated 5 stars on Google

How can we help?

Get expert legal advice.

If you need any legal advice or assistance with regards to personal or family law, contact the Davis Blank Furniss team now.

Get expert legal advice.

If you need any legal advice or assistance with regards to personal or family law, contact the Davis Blank Furniss team now.










    Manchester Office

    If you need any legal advice or assistance from our Manchester office, contact the Davis Blank Furniss team now.

    Glossop Office

    If you need any legal advice or assistance from our Glossop office, contact the Davis Blank Furniss team now.

    Richard Hamilton

    Richard Hamilton

    Managing Partner
    Kate Oldfield

    Kate Oldfield

    Senior Partner
    Andrew Ryan

    Andrew Ryan

    Partner
    Sonio Singh

    Sonio Singh

    Partner
    Andy McNish

    Andy McNish

    Partner
    Debra Kelly

    Debra Kelly

    Partner
    Shiva Shadi

    Shiva Shadi

    Partner
    Kirsty Morbey

    Kirsty Morbey

    Partner
    Seán Hackett

    Seán Hackett

    Partner
    Jennifer Smith

    Jennifer Smith

    Partner
    Rosie Korcz

    Rosie Korcz

    Partner