Our Manchester office is rated 5 stars on Google
Categories
Featured
748 Results
A clever idea by a senior executive backfired in the case of ICAP Management Services Limited –v- Bury. Mr Bury had given...
The Chancery Division has held in MPT Group v Peel that two relatively senior employees did not have to reveal their intentions...
The assessment of whether an employee has a strong connection to the UK is an objective test rather than a subjective test...
In J v K, the EAT held that the appellant could not rely on vague medical evidence to get an extension of...
It has been held that, where the making of a disclosure was the principal reason for a dismissal, the decision taker’s belief...
In Lidl v CAC, the Court of Appeal held that single small units of an employer’s workforce should be subject to compulsory...
In Fulton v Bear Scotland, the EAT held that the employment tribunal was right to consider itself bound by the earlier EAT...
In Hartley v King Edward VI College, the Supreme Court held that if teachers lawfully strike for one day, the employer can...
The EAT has held that there is not a particularly high threshold required for an employer to meet when dismissing an employee...
In The Government Legal Service v Brookes, the EAT held that a job applicant with Aspergers Syndrome (AS) was discriminated against by...
The Supreme Court has recently held in Essop and others v Home Office (UK Border Agency) and Naeem v Secretary for Justice...
Excellent experience start to finish – always very responsive to any queries and the turnaround on the property I was buying was very quick, even in the busy time leading up to stamp duty deadline. Jenny was always very helpful and went above and beyond to close on a short timescale.
“Very approachable, practical solutions to problems, but most of all very responsive which I personally think is very important because if you need help, you need it quickly, or at least to know someone is looking at it for you”.
“Always able to contact, very approachable, friendly and professional”
“I believe I have been able to establish a professional working relationship with everyone I have come into contact. Importantly, I sense the relationships which have been established give me the confidence that I can make contact with Davis Blank Furniss at any time and on any matter. I would also like to express my thanks to the very impressive “gatekeepers” who work in reception, not only for making me very welcome, but also for their professionalism”
“Thank you for your efficient and friendly help throughout this process. We have had it easy but your approach has been part of that”.
“I would like to take this opportunity to thank you personally for the ongoing support and assistance the firm has offered to our parents over the years. I hope also that we may be able to call on you if necessary in the future.”
“Jo always provides great service, understands our needs and delivers on her promises. Our needs are relatively simple but the complexity arises out of the volume of work and short time frames, Jo always delivers.”
“A big thank you to all who dealt with my wife’s claim… We would not hesitate to recommend Davis Blank Furniss to anyone that may be in a situation like we have been…”
“Before putting my case in Kirsty (Morbey)’s capable hands I’ve met a couple of other solicitors. None of them listen to me as intently as Kirsty and showed me as much empathy and understanding as she did. Simultaneously she was able to look at my case from legal perspective, explain all the options and follow each of our meetings with written summary of the discussed matters (in timely manner). Her advice was invaluable and led me to successfully ending the case matter (hopeful for good). I’m forever grateful for he work and would definitely recommend her to anyone looking for reliable, knowledgeable and committed solicitor”.
Our Manchester office is rated 5 stars on Google
