Employment Law Newsletter - Jan 2013 | Davis Blank Furniss Solicitors

Welcome to our first Employment Law Newsletter 2013, keeping you up to date with changes in employment law and informing you of recent case law developments.

For a change, I am pleased to tell you that there has not been a huge amount of case law or new Legislation in the last few months.  It is no doubt the quiet before the storm!

The Government has however announced plans to tackle long term sickness absence.  It is proposed that employers will have access to an advisory service where sickness absence lasts more than 4 weeks.

The Government has also issued a consultation on reforming legislation regulating employment agencies.  We will keep you up to date on the progress of these in future newsletters.


Fair Reason for Dismissal – Redundancy

The EAT Held in Fish –v- Glen Golf Club that the Club Secretary had been fairly dismissed by reason of redundancy despite long standing concerns about his conduct and capability.

Mr Fish sought to prove that his dismissal had been by reason of conduct and capability rather than the stated reason of redundancy.  The Respondents were able to show that he was one of 4 employees dismissed on the grounds of redundancy and that they were making serious losses.

The EAT stated that looking at the evidence the principle reason for dismissal was redundancy and any criticism of Mr Fish’s conduct or capability were very much in the background.

Fixed Term Contracts

The Court of Appeal has Held in Hudson –v- Department of Work and Pensions that time worked by Ms Hudson under a training scheme did not count towards the 4 years needed for a fixed term employee to become a permanent employee.  The Fixed Term Employee (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002 stipulate that anyone employed under a succession of fixed term contracts will become a permanent employee after 4 years unless you are able to show that continuation of such fixed term contracts is objectively justified.

There is however an exemption for employees on a training/work experience scheme arranged by the Government or funded by the European Community.

Having been given a permanent post Ms Hudson argued that being given a proper post on a fixed term contract following 3 years on such a training scheme meant she could now have the status of a permanent employee and as she was no longer working under a training scheme the exclusion did not apply.  However the Court unanimously disagreed with her arguments.

Religious Discrimination

Hot off the press is the case of Nadia Eweida –v- British Airways in which the European Court of Human Rights have ruled that the English Courts breached a British woman’s Freedom of Religion Rights to wear a crucifix in the workplace.  It was described as a visible symbol of her faith.

British Airways’ Uniform Policy requires staff members to conceal religious items that they wear under their clothes.  Miss Eweida lodged a claim for Religious Discrimination.  She did not succeed in the lower Courts.

However the Court of European Human Rights ruled that there had been a failure to strike a fair balance between British Airways’ legitimate wish to project a certain corporate image and this particular employees right to manifest her religion.

However, this should be contrasted with the case of a nurse whose manager told her that wearing a crucifix outside her uniform was a health and safety risk to patients and she was instructed to remove it.

In that case the Court of European Human Rights found in favour of the employer and stated that Hospital Managers were better placed to make decisions about clinical safety than a Court.


Read what our clients have to say...

View All

Excellent experience start to finish – always very responsive to any queries and the turnaround on the property I was buying was very quick, even in the busy time leading up to stamp duty deadline. Jenny was always very helpful and went above and beyond to close on a short timescale.

Ben Armitage

“Very approachable, practical solutions to problems, but most of all very responsive which I personally think is very important because if you need help, you need it quickly, or at least to know someone is looking at it for you”.

Joanne Rowe, Finance Director, Greater Manchester Chamber

“Always able to contact, very approachable, friendly and professional”

Nives Feely, JAM Recruitment

“I believe I have been able to establish a professional working relationship with everyone I have come into contact. Importantly, I sense the relationships which have been established give me the confidence that I can make contact with Davis Blank Furniss at any time and on any matter. I would also like to express my thanks to the very impressive “gatekeepers” who work in reception, not only for making me very welcome, but also for their professionalism”

Bill Pryke, CEO, Chartered Institution of Civil Engineering Surveyors

“Thank you for your efficient and friendly help throughout this process. We have had it easy but your approach has been part of that”.

Robert Amsbury (Conveyancing Client)

“I would like to take this opportunity to thank you personally for the ongoing support and assistance the firm has offered to our parents over the years. I hope also that we may be able to call on you if necessary in the future.”

Valerie Fisher (Probate Client)

“Jo always provides great service, understands our needs and delivers on her promises. Our needs are relatively simple but the complexity arises out of the volume of work and short time frames, Jo always delivers.”

Peter Fernandez, Corporate Director at Royal Bank of Scotland

“A big thank you to all who dealt with my wife’s claim… We would not hesitate to recommend Davis Blank Furniss to anyone that may be in a situation like we have been…”

Anon (Personal Injury client)

“Before putting my case in Kirsty (Morbey)’s capable hands I’ve met a couple of other solicitors. None of them listen to me as intently as Kirsty and showed me as much empathy and understanding as she did. Simultaneously she was able to look at my case from legal perspective, explain all the options and follow each of our meetings with written summary of the discussed matters (in timely manner). Her advice was invaluable and led me to successfully ending the case matter (hopeful for good). I’m forever grateful for he work and would definitely recommend her to anyone looking for reliable, knowledgeable and committed solicitor”.

Anon (Family client)
5 star service

Our Manchester office is rated 5 stars on Google