Welcome to November’s edition of our employment law newsletter, keeping you up to date with forthcoming changes to legislation and case developments.

Change to unfair dismissal qualifying period

The Chancellor announced at the Conservative Party conference in October that the qualifying period for unfair dismissal will be increased from one year to two years with effect from 6th April 2012.  There has been no confirmation as to whether this will apply to existing employees.  The government estimates that the change will save businesses £6 million per year, and will reduce the number of Tribunal claims by 2,000 per year.

 Introduction of fees for Tribunal claims

The Chancellor has also announced that fees will be introduced in employment tribunals.  A consultation is due to be launched in November, and it is currently understood that fees will become payable from April 2013.  Although no official confirmation has been given, it is rumoured that the issue fee payable by claimants will be £250, with a listing fee of £1,000.  Higher fees may be put in place for claims with a high value.  Reports suggest that there may be a sliding scale for those on low incomes, or that an exemption will be provided for those who have no means to pay the fees.

“Protected conversations” and “unproductive workers”

Stories in the press in October have suggested that the government has plans for further changes in employment law.  Nick Clegg has suggested that business should be able to have frank discussions with their employees about retirement and their future with the business without fear of proceedings being issued.  A leaked government report has suggested that unproductive workers should lose their right to bring a claim for unfair dismissal.  The government have declined to comment officially but an insider has said that the proposals are ‘unlikely’.

CASE LAW DEVELOPMENTS IN OCTOBER

Holiday entitlement and employees on sick leave

A Tribunal has held that employees who have been unable or unwilling to take their annual leave because of sickness should be allowed to carry over the full 5.6 weeks’ statutory holiday leave into the next leave year.  Adams and another v Harwich International Port Limited.

Reason for dismissal?

In Screene v Seatwave, the EAT has held that a dismissal can be fair by reason of conduct, even where the employer has pleaded capability as the reason for dismissal in the ET3 and at the Tribunal hearing, as long as there is no prejudice to the Claimant.

 Whistleblowing and vicarious liability

The Court of Appeal has held in NHS Manchester v Fecitt and Others that an employer cannot be held vicariously liable under the whistleblowing legislation where its employees victimise their whistleblowing colleagues.  Vicarious liability can only arise where an employee has carried out an unlawful act.

Mistaken termination

The Court of Appeal has held in CF Capital v Willoughby that an employer could not retract a termination notice which it claimed had been issued as a result of a misunderstanding.  The notice was clear and intended to terminate the employee’s contract.

If you require any further clarification in relation to the above developments, or if you need any other assistance then please do not hesitate to contact our team of specialist employment solicitors on 0161 832 3304:

Shiva Shadi              Partner

Anna Bunting            Partner

Claire Smith             Associate Solicitor

Testimonials

Read what our clients have to say...

View All

Excellent experience start to finish – always very responsive to any queries and the turnaround on the property I was buying was very quick, even in the busy time leading up to stamp duty deadline. Jenny was always very helpful and went above and beyond to close on a short timescale.

Ben Armitage

“Very approachable, practical solutions to problems, but most of all very responsive which I personally think is very important because if you need help, you need it quickly, or at least to know someone is looking at it for you”.

Joanne Rowe, Finance Director, Greater Manchester Chamber

“Always able to contact, very approachable, friendly and professional”

Nives Feely, JAM Recruitment

“I believe I have been able to establish a professional working relationship with everyone I have come into contact. Importantly, I sense the relationships which have been established give me the confidence that I can make contact with Davis Blank Furniss at any time and on any matter. I would also like to express my thanks to the very impressive “gatekeepers” who work in reception, not only for making me very welcome, but also for their professionalism”

Bill Pryke, CEO, Chartered Institution of Civil Engineering Surveyors

“Thank you for your efficient and friendly help throughout this process. We have had it easy but your approach has been part of that”.

Robert Amsbury (Conveyancing Client)

“I would like to take this opportunity to thank you personally for the ongoing support and assistance the firm has offered to our parents over the years. I hope also that we may be able to call on you if necessary in the future.”

Valerie Fisher (Probate Client)

“Jo always provides great service, understands our needs and delivers on her promises. Our needs are relatively simple but the complexity arises out of the volume of work and short time frames, Jo always delivers.”

Peter Fernandez, Corporate Director at Royal Bank of Scotland

“A big thank you to all who dealt with my wife’s claim… We would not hesitate to recommend Davis Blank Furniss to anyone that may be in a situation like we have been…”

Anon (Personal Injury client)

“Before putting my case in Kirsty (Morbey)’s capable hands I’ve met a couple of other solicitors. None of them listen to me as intently as Kirsty and showed me as much empathy and understanding as she did. Simultaneously she was able to look at my case from legal perspective, explain all the options and follow each of our meetings with written summary of the discussed matters (in timely manner). Her advice was invaluable and led me to successfully ending the case matter (hopeful for good). I’m forever grateful for he work and would definitely recommend her to anyone looking for reliable, knowledgeable and committed solicitor”.

Anon (Family client)
5 star service

Our Manchester office is rated 5 stars on Google