Jackson Reforms - An Opinion | Davis Blank Furniss Solicitors

Let’s not forget that the victim of an accident or a patient who has been injured as a result of a negligent doctor is often completely innocent.  The  aim of negligence laws is to place such a person in a position as if the harm had not been done to them.  The recent changes in funding and more particularly the Jackson Reforms contravene this basic right of English law.

The first assistance that victims of accidents had taken away from them was legal aid.  The applications were quite stringent.  You had to show to the legal aid board that the client had an excellent case.  You then had to show through means testing that the client could not afford to pay their legal fees.  Often these cases were successful and the legal aid board was paid in full.  As a result the legal aid system for personal injury was not a drain on Government purses.  Despite this they abolished this for all but a few personal injury cases and following this decision the Government invented the system of no win no fees.

It was the Government’s idea that as Solicitors had to take a chance on bringing a case that they should be paid a success fee in addition to their normal fee.  Initially this success fee was paid by the client out of their damages.  The rules were changed and the amount was subsequently paid by the opponent in the event of a win.  This system had a problem though. Formerly if the client had the benefit of a legal aid certificate they were protected from having to pay the other side’s costs in the event of a failed case.  As a no win no fee agreement did not offer the client this protection after the event insurance was brought into being and the cost of this was also recoverable from the other side in the event of a win.

The Government’s new proposals are that the success fee should now be paid from client’s own damages and also the cost of any insurance policy should be discharged from damages.  As a result, people who are the most vulnerable in our society and those who have been injured will in effect have to pay for the cost of running their case out of their damages.  This seems wholly unfair.  No doubt insurers will say that generally legal costs are escalating.  Surely it would be in everybody’s interest to spend money investing in prevention of accidents rather than compensating them afterwards.

People do complain about health and safety regulations, but they are there for a purpose.  180 workers are killed at work every year.  130,000 other injuries to employees were reported under RIDOR.  29.3 million days were lost overall due to work related ill health and work place injury.  On our roads 2,200 people are killed every year and 24,500 are seriously injured.  I  believe that obtaining compensation for pain and suffering and repayment of wages lost and expenses incurred is worthwhile and that clients should not be penalised for being the victim of an accident.

Kate Oldfield

Managing Partner


Read what our clients have to say...

View All

Excellent experience start to finish – always very responsive to any queries and the turnaround on the property I was buying was very quick, even in the busy time leading up to stamp duty deadline. Jenny was always very helpful and went above and beyond to close on a short timescale.

Ben Armitage

“Very approachable, practical solutions to problems, but most of all very responsive which I personally think is very important because if you need help, you need it quickly, or at least to know someone is looking at it for you”.

Joanne Rowe, Finance Director, Greater Manchester Chamber

“Always able to contact, very approachable, friendly and professional”

Nives Feely, JAM Recruitment

“I believe I have been able to establish a professional working relationship with everyone I have come into contact. Importantly, I sense the relationships which have been established give me the confidence that I can make contact with Davis Blank Furniss at any time and on any matter. I would also like to express my thanks to the very impressive “gatekeepers” who work in reception, not only for making me very welcome, but also for their professionalism”

Bill Pryke, CEO, Chartered Institution of Civil Engineering Surveyors

“Thank you for your efficient and friendly help throughout this process. We have had it easy but your approach has been part of that”.

Robert Amsbury (Conveyancing Client)

“I would like to take this opportunity to thank you personally for the ongoing support and assistance the firm has offered to our parents over the years. I hope also that we may be able to call on you if necessary in the future.”

Valerie Fisher (Probate Client)

“Jo always provides great service, understands our needs and delivers on her promises. Our needs are relatively simple but the complexity arises out of the volume of work and short time frames, Jo always delivers.”

Peter Fernandez, Corporate Director at Royal Bank of Scotland

“A big thank you to all who dealt with my wife’s claim… We would not hesitate to recommend Davis Blank Furniss to anyone that may be in a situation like we have been…”

Anon (Personal Injury client)

“Before putting my case in Kirsty (Morbey)’s capable hands I’ve met a couple of other solicitors. None of them listen to me as intently as Kirsty and showed me as much empathy and understanding as she did. Simultaneously she was able to look at my case from legal perspective, explain all the options and follow each of our meetings with written summary of the discussed matters (in timely manner). Her advice was invaluable and led me to successfully ending the case matter (hopeful for good). I’m forever grateful for he work and would definitely recommend her to anyone looking for reliable, knowledgeable and committed solicitor”.

Anon (Family client)
5 star service

Our Manchester office is rated 5 stars on Google