The placeholder featured image.

From a historical perspective, Section 77 Finance Act 1986 has been a key tool regarding relief from Stamp Duty on share for share exchanges.  The key conditions are detailed at Section 77(3) and include the following:

  • The relevant transfer of shares must form part of a transaction where the acquiring company (Topco) acquires 100% of the issued share capital of the relevant target company (Target) in exchange for the issue of new shares in Topco.
  • The shareholders in Topco after the relevant share for share exchange directly reflect those in Target immediately prior to the transaction – i.e. each person who is a shareholder of Target is therefore a shareholder in Topco and the shares are of the same class/proportions.
  • The transaction is effected for bona fide commercial reasons and does not form part of a scheme or arrangement where one of the primary purposes relates to tax avoidance.

RECENT CHANGES

With effect from 29th June 2016, new legislation now denies this share for share relief if there are “disqualifying arrangements” at issue at the time of the share for share exchange.  Section 77A Finance Act 1986 defines disqualifying arrangements as follows:

“If it is reasonable to assume that the purpose/purposes of the transaction is to ensure that a particular person obtains control of the acquiring company or particular persons together/in concert obtain control of that acquiring company”

Consequently this new legislation appears to be a barrier for any transactions which seek to overcome the already factual and purposive test that there is no change in control or tax avoidance.  It is also evident that HMRC are seeking to catch corporate re-constructions that entail a strategic exit.

However, it is worth noting that the disqualifying arrangements may not necessarily apply to the following scenarios:

  • Where there is a Corporate Reorganisation prior to a future disposal (where such disposal is not planned at the time of the Reorganisation in question).
  • Where there is a relevant Reorganisation prior to a liquidation or IPO.
  • Where there is a relevant merger arrangement e.g. an arrangement whereby a Corporate Reorganisation detailed above is then followed by a further share for share exchange between Topco and a new holding company (so there are two new holding companies added to the corporate group).  However even in this unusual scenario, it is recommended that guidance is sought from HMRC.

CONCLUSION

These statutory amendments may signal a return (for now) to liquidation demergers when separating a business.  However, it is clear that as HMRC continue to intensify their scrutiny of the key area of Section 77 Stamp Duty Relief, professional advice is taken at an early stage at all times.  It is also apparent that pre-transaction rulings from HMRC are the best way forward.

If you have any queries, please contact Sonio.

Testimonials

Read what our clients have to say...

View All

Excellent experience start to finish – always very responsive to any queries and the turnaround on the property I was buying was very quick, even in the busy time leading up to stamp duty deadline. Jenny was always very helpful and went above and beyond to close on a short timescale.

Ben Armitage

“Very approachable, practical solutions to problems, but most of all very responsive which I personally think is very important because if you need help, you need it quickly, or at least to know someone is looking at it for you”.

Joanne Rowe, Finance Director, Greater Manchester Chamber

“Always able to contact, very approachable, friendly and professional”

Nives Feely, JAM Recruitment

“I believe I have been able to establish a professional working relationship with everyone I have come into contact. Importantly, I sense the relationships which have been established give me the confidence that I can make contact with Davis Blank Furniss at any time and on any matter. I would also like to express my thanks to the very impressive “gatekeepers” who work in reception, not only for making me very welcome, but also for their professionalism”

Bill Pryke, CEO, Chartered Institution of Civil Engineering Surveyors

“Thank you for your efficient and friendly help throughout this process. We have had it easy but your approach has been part of that”.

Robert Amsbury (Conveyancing Client)

“I would like to take this opportunity to thank you personally for the ongoing support and assistance the firm has offered to our parents over the years. I hope also that we may be able to call on you if necessary in the future.”

Valerie Fisher (Probate Client)

“Jo always provides great service, understands our needs and delivers on her promises. Our needs are relatively simple but the complexity arises out of the volume of work and short time frames, Jo always delivers.”

Peter Fernandez, Corporate Director at Royal Bank of Scotland

“A big thank you to all who dealt with my wife’s claim… We would not hesitate to recommend Davis Blank Furniss to anyone that may be in a situation like we have been…”

Anon (Personal Injury client)

“Before putting my case in Kirsty (Morbey)’s capable hands I’ve met a couple of other solicitors. None of them listen to me as intently as Kirsty and showed me as much empathy and understanding as she did. Simultaneously she was able to look at my case from legal perspective, explain all the options and follow each of our meetings with written summary of the discussed matters (in timely manner). Her advice was invaluable and led me to successfully ending the case matter (hopeful for good). I’m forever grateful for he work and would definitely recommend her to anyone looking for reliable, knowledgeable and committed solicitor”.

Anon (Family client)
5 star service

Our Manchester office is rated 5 stars on Google