Discussing Restrictive Covenants | Davis Blank Furniss

What is a restrictive covenant?

Restrictive Covenants (sometimes known as ‘restraint of trade’ clauses or ‘bar-outs’) are used by businesses to protect their interests in two common circumstances:

~ By an employer restricting an employee’s activities after the end of his or her employment;


~ By the buyer of a business restricting the seller’s activities after the sale.

For long-held public policy reasons, English Law dislikes clauses which restrain free trade and individuals’ freedom to contract and so such clauses are only enforceable if they are (and provided they do not go beyond) what is required to protect legitimate business interests.

The only recognised business interests are:

~ ‘trade connections’ (including customer contacts, general business goodwill and reputation, and relations with staff); and

~ trade secrets and confidential information.

A covenant protecting trade connections must be limited in terms of the restrictive activities themselves, and apply for a limited time and within a limited geographical area (if appropriate).

However trade secrets and confidential information also often give rise to their own proprietary rights and so the owner may well be entitled to protect them more widely (without necessarily any geographic or time limits).

A paper document of a non compete

Types of restrictive covenant

  • Non-solicitation restrictive covenants (this means the covenantor agrees not to approach people such as customers, potential customers or other employees with a view to enticing them away from or altering their relationship with the business). Generally, the covenants should be restricted to people that the covenantor has had recent contact with.
  • Non-dealing restrictive covenants. This is similar but covers any commercial dealings with the person. This type of covenant has a clear advantage as it avoids the need to prove that the former employee made an approach, which is usually difficult to show. However, it is wider and therefore can be more difficult to enforce.
  • Non-competition restrictive covenant. These are much easier to enforce against business sellers than employees (as competition would damage the goodwill the seller has just been paid for). It is sometimes possible to enforce these against key employees but not if they would make it impossible for the employee to find suitable replacement employment.

Ensure restrictive covenants are drafted carefully

It is dangerous to simply re-use old covenants in new contracts as case law and judicial practice changes rapidly in this area.

It is critical that restrictive covenants are drafted carefully by a professional so that they properly reflect the covenantor’s role and the circumstances of the business and do not go beyond what is legitimately required.

Also, all covenants should be carefully layered and a severance clause inserted into the contract so that one or more of them can fail without bringing down the others.

In the case of employees, the business should regularly review contracts that include restrictive covenants and check whether they need to be updated (for example, if the employee’s role has changed).

In general, it is easier to enforce longer and wider covenants in the case of the seller of a business (or of shares in a business unless the shareholding was tiny) as often most of the purchase price is a payment for the goodwill which the covenant is seeking to protect. For similar reasons, allowing employee covenants to last longer than 12 months (including any period of ‘garden leave’) is extremely rare, whereas two years is standard in business sales and periods of up to five years have been found to be acceptable in certain circumstances.

Please visit Andy’s profile should you wish to talk to him about this or any other business law related matter.

Found this article useful? You might be interested in some of our others:


Read what our clients have to say...

View All

Excellent experience start to finish – always very responsive to any queries and the turnaround on the property I was buying was very quick, even in the busy time leading up to stamp duty deadline. Jenny was always very helpful and went above and beyond to close on a short timescale.

Ben Armitage

“Very approachable, practical solutions to problems, but most of all very responsive which I personally think is very important because if you need help, you need it quickly, or at least to know someone is looking at it for you”.

Joanne Rowe, Finance Director, Greater Manchester Chamber

“Always able to contact, very approachable, friendly and professional”

Nives Feely, JAM Recruitment

“I believe I have been able to establish a professional working relationship with everyone I have come into contact. Importantly, I sense the relationships which have been established give me the confidence that I can make contact with Davis Blank Furniss at any time and on any matter. I would also like to express my thanks to the very impressive “gatekeepers” who work in reception, not only for making me very welcome, but also for their professionalism”

Bill Pryke, CEO, Chartered Institution of Civil Engineering Surveyors

“Thank you for your efficient and friendly help throughout this process. We have had it easy but your approach has been part of that”.

Robert Amsbury (Conveyancing Client)

“I would like to take this opportunity to thank you personally for the ongoing support and assistance the firm has offered to our parents over the years. I hope also that we may be able to call on you if necessary in the future.”

Valerie Fisher (Probate Client)

“Jo always provides great service, understands our needs and delivers on her promises. Our needs are relatively simple but the complexity arises out of the volume of work and short time frames, Jo always delivers.”

Peter Fernandez, Corporate Director at Royal Bank of Scotland

“A big thank you to all who dealt with my wife’s claim… We would not hesitate to recommend Davis Blank Furniss to anyone that may be in a situation like we have been…”

Anon (Personal Injury client)

“Before putting my case in Kirsty (Morbey)’s capable hands I’ve met a couple of other solicitors. None of them listen to me as intently as Kirsty and showed me as much empathy and understanding as she did. Simultaneously she was able to look at my case from legal perspective, explain all the options and follow each of our meetings with written summary of the discussed matters (in timely manner). Her advice was invaluable and led me to successfully ending the case matter (hopeful for good). I’m forever grateful for he work and would definitely recommend her to anyone looking for reliable, knowledgeable and committed solicitor”.

Anon (Family client)
5 star service

Our Manchester office is rated 5 stars on Google