Kirsty Morbey

It has recently been confirmed by the Government that they intend to review the 50-year-old Matrimonial Causes Act in order to make it easier for divorcing couples to resolve the financial issues arising when their marriage breaks down. The hope is that this will help to avoid costly legal battles.

divorce law signing of an agreement

Does the law need updating?

The current legal guidance is often criticised as expensive and unpredictable, but sometimes divorcing couples have no other option than to turn to Court as there is a real lack of clear guidance on how wealth should be divided upon separation. However, Lord Christopher Bellamy, Justice Minister, told the House of Lords that he plans to ask the Law Commission to examine whether the Act needs updating. The Law Commission is to be tasked with investigating the matter and establishing exactly what the existing law and practice is and where the problems lie.  They will also run some comparisons with other jurisdictions, including Australia.

The general starting point for the English legal system is that the combined wealth of a divorcing couple will be split equally, even if one partner is the breadwinner.  This is in stark contrast to many other European countries where financial awards are far less generous and ongoing payments from a working spouse to a non-working spouse following a marital breakdown, which are known as Periodical Payments or maintenance, are only ever awarded for a limited number of years.

The current system has led to accusations of “jurisdiction shopping”, where many non-working wives of the very wealthy (soon to be ex-husbands) look to commence divorce proceedings in London as the Courts there are seen to be generous in their overall financial rewards when compared to other European jurisdictions.

Main issues with the law

One of the main issues faced by family lawyers practicing in this area is that the Law relies heavily on the discretion of the judge hearing the case, which can lead to unpredictable outcomes.  As the guidelines are now 50 years out of date, it gives rise to further arguments because society has changed so much in the last half century. The legislation basically allows judges to use their discretion to assess each case on its own facts and make different awards. This creates great uncertainty and makes it far more difficult for family lawyers to give specific advice.

Ultimately, six different judges looking at the same set of facts could come up with six different outcomes. There are also regional differences with the London courts seeming to be far more generous than a lot of the courts outside of the area. Society, marriage and employment have changed so much over the last five decades, so it is somewhat unbelievable that such important issues are still being decided upon a 50-year-old law. The report of the Law Commission will no doubt be eagerly anticipated by most practicing family lawyers and will (hopefully) lead to a positive reform for the future.

For impartial expert advice on all family law matters, contact our Family Team.

Found this article useful? You might be interested in some of our others:

Testimonials

Read what our clients have to say...

View All

Excellent experience start to finish – always very responsive to any queries and the turnaround on the property I was buying was very quick, even in the busy time leading up to stamp duty deadline. Jenny was always very helpful and went above and beyond to close on a short timescale.

Ben Armitage

“Very approachable, practical solutions to problems, but most of all very responsive which I personally think is very important because if you need help, you need it quickly, or at least to know someone is looking at it for you”.

Joanne Rowe, Finance Director, Greater Manchester Chamber

“Always able to contact, very approachable, friendly and professional”

Nives Feely, JAM Recruitment

“I believe I have been able to establish a professional working relationship with everyone I have come into contact. Importantly, I sense the relationships which have been established give me the confidence that I can make contact with Davis Blank Furniss at any time and on any matter. I would also like to express my thanks to the very impressive “gatekeepers” who work in reception, not only for making me very welcome, but also for their professionalism”

Bill Pryke, CEO, Chartered Institution of Civil Engineering Surveyors

“Thank you for your efficient and friendly help throughout this process. We have had it easy but your approach has been part of that”.

Robert Amsbury (Conveyancing Client)

“I would like to take this opportunity to thank you personally for the ongoing support and assistance the firm has offered to our parents over the years. I hope also that we may be able to call on you if necessary in the future.”

Valerie Fisher (Probate Client)

“Jo always provides great service, understands our needs and delivers on her promises. Our needs are relatively simple but the complexity arises out of the volume of work and short time frames, Jo always delivers.”

Peter Fernandez, Corporate Director at Royal Bank of Scotland

“A big thank you to all who dealt with my wife’s claim… We would not hesitate to recommend Davis Blank Furniss to anyone that may be in a situation like we have been…”

Anon (Personal Injury client)

“Before putting my case in Kirsty (Morbey)’s capable hands I’ve met a couple of other solicitors. None of them listen to me as intently as Kirsty and showed me as much empathy and understanding as she did. Simultaneously she was able to look at my case from legal perspective, explain all the options and follow each of our meetings with written summary of the discussed matters (in timely manner). Her advice was invaluable and led me to successfully ending the case matter (hopeful for good). I’m forever grateful for he work and would definitely recommend her to anyone looking for reliable, knowledgeable and committed solicitor”.

Anon (Family client)
5 star service

Our Manchester office is rated 5 stars on Google